| I have read many Eye 2's reviews. All are very | | | | bag. I can't have a better full set of clubs. The |
| consistent with my opinion. I am only glad to | | | | only thing that is missing in my bag is a Ping Eye |
| know that I am not the only golfer convinced | | | | 2+ LW that I will have the loft changed from |
| that the Eye 2 is tops even +20 years later. I | | | | 58° to 60° once I am able to find at a |
| bought my set new about 22 years ago. Have | | | | reasonable price. I must add that the price that it |
| tried other clubs deep cavity, forged, over size, | | | | is priced for (Ping $145.00 ebay similar price |
| super game improvers, you name it and I have | | | | range) is truly outrageous but I am willing to pay |
| tried them but the truth is that nothing is better | | | | the price in order to complete the best set of |
| than Eye 2's, comparable maybe but better is a | | | | irons anyone could ever have. |
| hard task to beat and undertake. True, the sound | | | | Today if I HAD to replace my Eye 2's, which I |
| of these clubs are not the best. In exchange for | | | | don't, I would probably buy the Mizuno MX-19 or |
| their forgiveness and overall performance this is a | | | | Ping G5 because of their similarity and comparable |
| minor price to pay. All balanced, the only down | | | | overall performance balance with the Eye 2's. As |
| side is the lofts between some of the clubs. | | | | a technical man that I am and involved for |
| Some of the lofts of the irons may be some | | | | several decades in the machining business, I think |
| what out dated but still, acceptable distance and | | | | I have learned to know the difference between |
| great trajectories. I will ask and maybe my pro | | | | looks and more importantly, performance. |
| shop can change the lofts. If they are able to do | | | | Unfortunately many golf clubs today are designed |
| this (Golfsmth claims they can) I will end up with | | | | around looks for differentiation rather than true |
| the ultimate golf irons from excellent that they as | | | | game improvers. |
| is. | | | | By far the best is what is best for you. Don't shy |
| Over the years I have always come back to my | | | | away from these + 20 year old club. They were |
| Eye 2's. I have come to understand after years | | | | designed and made with true vision of the future |
| of trying one and another, and I must say, there | | | | and technical intelligence. With all due respect, Ping |
| are many wonderful sets out there in the market, | | | | has not been able to come up with a noticeable |
| that I will stay with my Eye 2 irons until the end | | | | better iron in the last 20 years as they did back in |
| of their useful life, that is, if they don't out live | | | | the late 80's and early 90's. Rapture and distance |
| me, today age 57, As it stands today I have only | | | | is not what middle to low handicapped golfers are |
| replaced my long 4 iron with a Ping G5 25° | | | | looking for. Golfers in this category are who would |
| hybrid as the 3 iron with a #7 G5 wood. This | | | | be more than pleased and willing to pay the |
| addition together with my G5 driver, #3 & | | | | +$1,000 price range for a true and noticeable |
| #5 woods and an old Ping Putter make up my | | | | technical innovation. |